How Make Dog Stools Hard

The Fun Theory

Today rebuke from one of the drawers of memory a university exam a few years ago.
The book in question is called IN - LUSIO [The training game as aesthetics, C. Gily, Grauss 2000 edition], a treatise on aesthetics and theory of communication that is based on a simple assumption efficace: il gioco come in-lusio .

In effetti giocare è un pò come sognare, allontanarsi dalla realtà e trascenderne.

E' guardare le cose da un proprio ostinato punto di vista, con l'ottimismo di chi sa essere padrone del gioco.
L' In-lusio non dà il senso della realtà, ma costruisce il futuro, l'azione.
Il gioco è la capacità di costruire sistematicamente una realtà altra, senza ingerenze realistiche, ma che contemporaneamente può essere utile alla realtà.
Basti pensare agli esperimenti ludico didattici che sempre più spesso prendono piede nelle scuole e nei laboratori.
In quest'ottica l'elemento centrale for the understanding of the game is to see it as an act of thought acquaintance, how to build - not just learning - the idea of \u200b\u200bsocial life, work and culture.

How come I missed this in mind??
Thanks to an alert by Enrico Russo (former organizer of the Late Show Night Bus), once production and realization of qulche play device that is socially useful.
Especially, with regard to the waste problem in which our city is jammed for too long, but not only that ...

Unfortunately I could not get on blogger a trovareil modo per incorporare i video da youtube, quindi per i video vi rimando al sito The fun theory o tutt'al più al mio blog gemello http://emilianamellone.wordpress.com/2010/11/10/the-fun-theory/

Guardate e stimolate la fantasia! E poi commentate, commentate, commentate... :)

Magari riusciamo ad inventarci qualcosa per la nostra città, invece di lamentarci solamente!

Santa Clause 2 Shania Twain Song

Explanation of the architectural

Explanation of the architectural
(source article GSE)



to numerous requests for clarification concerning the recognition of full integration architecture for photovoltaic systems, which use rigid modules used to cover elements of the building envelope with design solutions called "industrialized", states as follows.

for "industrialized" means a solution in which form and coverage identify a single product, not individually distinguishable, offered on the market.
Where you use standard photovoltaic modules, available on the market that do not play any building or structural function but have overlapping areas of coverage already provided with all necessary protective functions (holding, waterproofing, insulation, etc..), the recognition of the integration architecture is closely tied to the construction of a surface coating that covers the homogeneous portion of the cover subject of the intervention.
When PV modules do not cover the total area of \u200b\u200bcoverage, you must complete the integration by means of fake items (without solar cells) that replace the photovoltaic elements where there is shade and by closing it possible to join the spaces between the photovoltaic modules and elements traditional covering, the side edges, eaves and ridge.

Here are some illustrative figures.